Framework
What is Platform Sovereignty?
Platform sovereignty describes the condition in which a private platform acquires practical governing power over an essential function because exit becomes difficult, slow, or institutionally costly.
Section
Papers and framework notes on platform power, jurisdiction, strategic dependency, and the changing relationship between public authority and private infrastructure.
Framework
Platform sovereignty describes the condition in which a private platform acquires practical governing power over an essential function because exit becomes difficult, slow, or institutionally costly.
Framework
The indispensability threshold is crossed when replacing or bypassing a system ceases to be a normal procurement choice and becomes a strategic disruption.
Framework
Two mechanisms that stabilise coercive infrastructure by making it physically unreachable and analytically invisible — and what the FCPI framework reveals about both.
Paper
Electronic identification is usually judged by the reliability of its digital credentials. A field experiment in Ukraine shows that a system's real reliability — and the sovereignty built on it — depends on how the prescribed procedure is actually performed by people on the ground.
Paper
Ukraine’s Starlink whitelist was designed to exclude unauthorised Russian terminals from the network; within six months, the central security problem had shifted towards controlling how hostile terminals entered the approved list itself.
Paper
AI markets are fragmenting — not because models differ, but because governance does. A framework for understanding how export platforms, full-stack sovereignty, regulated dependence and market-conditioned access are reshaping AI procurement.
Paper
Ukrainian practitioner evidence from an April 2026 defence-industry panel reveals that adaptation speed is a vector across five sequential clocks, not a single national rate — and identifies institutional absorption capacity as a missing dimension of adaptive system quality.
Paper
A systems-engineering analysis of modern drone warfare arguing that durable coercive advantage is determined not by platform possession but by adaptive system quality — the capacity to close the observe-to-fielding loop faster than an adversary.
Paper
The EU's satellite-spectrum reservations and cloud procurement restrictions are not mere protectionism — they are the structural response our indispensable systems theory predicted.
Paper
The U.S. government's suspension of Fable 5 and Mythos 5 access for foreign nationals is an early signal that frontier AI models are crossing from platform product into indispensable infrastructure.
Paper
An engineering workflow for transforming institutionally captured political-security text into structured epistemic objects — addressing corpus-level semantic contamination before LLMs are deployed in legal, political, reputational, and defence domains.
Paper
New evidence from Pentagon contracts, U.S. Space Systems Command clarifications, and Ukraine's 2026 Starlink whitelist refines the original thesis: institutional separation does not require physical separation.
Paper
A platform can look neutral while it is still optional. Once dependence deepens, neutrality gives way to governance.
Paper
This paper examines why civil registration and whitelisting regimes cannot contain adversarial use of commercial LEO connectivity once that connectivity becomes indispensable for unmanned maritime operations — and why the UK is approaching the same threshold seen in Ukraine.
Paper
Civil governance models still treat satellite connectivity as a consumer product. Ukraine's experience shows why that fails — and why the UK is on the same trajectory.
Paper
A chronological case study tracing how expendable unmanned craft, commercial LEO connectivity and governance responses evolved from early innovation to the point at which the United Kingdom must decide whether to act.
Paper
A chronological case study tracing how Starlink crossed the indispensability threshold in Ukraine — from emergency activation in February 2022 to governance fragmentation and institutional separation by 2025.
Paper
Analysis of how Starlink became mission-critical infrastructure in Ukraine, why neutrality collapses under coercive dependency, and how Starshield represents institutional separation.
Paper
Most commentary on Starlink in Ukraine treats the story as a drama about personality or corporate politics. The deeper issue is structural: a privately governed platform became indispensable inside a coercive system but was still governed as a platform. Once that happened, neutrality stopped being stable.